Let's Face The Truth Head-on
The WHO isn't concerned with public health, but they want you to be very concerned.
The WHO isn't going to stop, and the WHO's largest funder is the US government.
The list was first published in 2017 and the last prioritization exercise was done in 2018. The current list includes COVID-19, Crimean-Cong haemorrhagic fever, Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus disease, Lassa fever, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Nipah and henipaviral diseases, Rift Valley fever, Zika and Disease X.
“This list of priority pathogens has become a reference point for the research community on where to focus energies to manage the next threat,” said Dr Soumya Swaminathan, WHO Chief Scientist. “It is developed together with experts in the field, and is the agreed direction for where we—as a global research community—need to invest energy and funds to develop tests, treatments and vaccines. We thank our donors like the US government, our partners, and the scientists who work with WHO to make this possible.”
Once again, the idea being that they are going to catch the next disease that has pandemic potential. The "Minority Report" version of "The Science," where people are able to somehow guess which viral pathogen is going to jump from an animal host to a human.
I don't think that determining which disease might jump from animal to human is even possible. I don't believe that those at the WHO believe it's possible either. It just looks good on paper, sounds scary, and will make governments spend money.
Why do I believe this? Because of the WHO's discussions about COVID-19 and the pandemic's global impacts. The discussions have nothing to do with science.
The key giveaway is the WHO’s proposed solution to what happened during the COVID-19 scare.
FOREWORD FROM
THE DIRECTOR-GENERALIn a little over 12 months the pandemic has claimed more than 2 million lives and damaged the economic and social fabric of every society. Across the world the pandemic has thrown existing inequalities into stark relief. Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals has stalled, and in some cases may have reversed. Up to 100 million people have slipped into extreme poverty – the first rise in global poverty in more than two decades.
...
Global collaboration and solidarity
continues to be criticalUp to 100 million people may have already slipped back into extreme poverty in 2020: the first rise in global poverty in more than two decades. A study commissioned by the International Chamber of Commerce concluded that even with high vaccine coverage in high-income countries, restricted [vaccine] coverage elsewhere would cost high-income economies an additional US$ 2.4 trillion in 2021 alone. The evidence is clear: solidarity and equity are the only routes out of the pandemic.
Solidarity and equity are going to get us out of a pandemic? I thought we need to prepare for Disease X. We could have another pandemic right?
Why is the WHO worried about the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals — and lists their stalled progress as one of the biggest setbacks caused by COVID-19? Wouldn't you imagine that the World (H-E-A-L-T-H) Organization would be more concerned about — world health?
Why should we listen to people who are obviously aren't concerned with what they want us to be concerned with.
The WHO is very busy making sure that a vaccine/health passport system is in place though, another non-scientific endeavor. Vaccine passports were decided at the G20 Summit a few years back. They're coming no matter what.
The truth is that the entire world is being corralled into a precarious position. The WHO is at the forefront of a centrally controlled system, designed to limit people's movement globally. This has never been a concern until COVID-19 came along.
Everyone needs to ask, "If COVID-19 has come and gone, why do we need a system like this? COVID-19 obviously didn't destroy the human race, why would we assume that the next pathogen would?
What do you think?
If you enjoy my writing, you might want to check out my original blog WindUpRubberFinger.com. I have decided to mirror my posts on Substack, and WindUpRubberFinger.com. I will work on moving older posts over to Substack as references for newer articles.
That's correct. Jeremy Farrar is the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization since 2023
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/25/jeremy-farrar-wellcome-covid-lockdown-inquiry-sage
*** Jeremy Farrar is the director of the Wellcome Trust, a former professor of tropical medicine at the University of Oxford and a member of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage). He has just published his account of the Covid crisis – Spike: The Virus v the People - in which he attacks the government for delaying a lockdown last autumn and describes the scientific and medical efforts that went into combating the pandemic. ***
Apparently Jeremy Farrar is all about lockdowns. Lockdowns have long been proven ineffective, and far more damaging than the effects of COVID-19.
There is no science behind lockdowns, because as he states in the article:
*** You cannot absolutely, categorically, determine where the virus came from. But I do think that the balance of scientific evidence points strongly in favour of a natural origin, though you cannot totally rule out laboratory accidents. In order to do that, you’d have to find the intermediate animal host. And that could be one of thousands of different species of animals. It’s a needle in the haystack. What could China do? ***
Attempting to determine the next pandemic
viral pathogen is what the WHO and the US Department of Defence suggests we do.
Let's say that the host for COVID-19 was some animal, if there's no way to determine the host animal now, after they have claimed to have gene sequenced the virus, how is anyone supposed to find the next animal host -- out of thousands of possible animal reservoirs? It could come from anywhere on the planet if we're to believe what is being said.
It's nonsense. It's a way to get endless funding for something that will never produce anything.
However, it will scare people, make others wildly rich, and allow the WHO, the UN, and other international institutions to develop a control system to limit AND TRACK people's movements all over the planet.
They tried to convince people that Contact Tracing was helpful during the COVID-19 scare, but that didn't go over so well. People didn't like apps being pushed to their phones-- when they didn't ask for them, only to find out that they were being tracked after the fact.
That's how the control system will work. Nobody will "ask for it" they will be told its necessary -- because of "science."
I seem to remember a former president, can’t remember his name offhand, that was vehemently against the who,and cut their funding, and pulled us out of it, but magically a virus appears out of nowhere,he’s beset with horrid cretins on all sides telling him what to do, and then mail in voting! Yay. And he is not re-elected in a landslide, obvious landslide in his favor. Trump, his name was Trump.